Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41674311›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2026

Signpost Testing to Navigate the Parameter Space of the Gaussian Graphical Model With High-Dimensional Data.

Kai Ruan, Mark A van de Wiel, Wessel N van Wieringen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kai RuanAmsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark A van de WielAmsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wessel N van WieringenAmsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

China Scholarship Council 202207720107Joint Research Fund for Overseas Chinese Scholars and Scholars in Hong Kong and Macao 202207720107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluate the relevance of external quantitative information on the parameter of a Gaussian graphical model from high-dimensional data. This information comes in the form of a parameter value available from a related knowledge domain or population. We contrast the external information to 'null' information, i.e., an internally accepted parameter value. The direction from a null to this externally provided parameter value is dubbed the signpost. The signpost test evaluates whether to follow the signpost in the search of the true parameter value. We present various test statistics to measure the informativeness of the signpost and ways to obtain their distribution under the null hypothesis of non-informativeness. By simulation, we investigate the power and other properties of the various signpost tests, and compare them to the likelihood ratio test. Finally, we employ the signpost test to illustrate how the learning of the Gaussian graphical model of a low-prevalence breast cancer subtype benefits from external knowledge obtained from data of a more prevalent and related but fundamentally different subtype.

Indexed as

BiometryModels, StatisticalBreast NeoplasmsHumansNormal Distributionasymptotic distributionbootstrapdirectional hypothesis testingp‐valueunbiasedness

Identifiers

PMID41674311
PMCPMC12895234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.