ArticleJournal of separation science2026
Integrating Optical Feedback Alignment and Fluidic Control for Multiphase Flow-Assisted In Situ 3D Printing.
Article in Journal of separation science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating Optical Feedback Alignment and Fluidic Control for Multiphase Flow-Assisted In Situ 3D Printing.Journal of separation science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Additive manufacturing is transforming how microfluidic devices are prototyped and fabricated. Among various 3D printing methods, stereolithography (SLA) has become a dominant technique for microfluidics due to its high resolution and design flexibility, with widespread use in lab-on-a-chip applications. However, intrinsic limitations of SLA printing, such as challenges related to multi-material integration and microstructure fabrication in enclosed channels, continue to hinder the development of more complex microsystems, especially for analytical separation and tissue engineering applications. In this paper, we present a multiphase flow-assisted in situ 3D printing method to address these challenges, developed based on our previously reported in situ 3D polymerization (IS-3DP) concept. Our method utilizes an aqueous two-phase system (ATPS) to generate sequential printing layers through controlled fluidic confinement and integrates an image-guided alignment system to enable precise projection of printing patterns in microchannels. We demonstrate that viscosity tuning of the ATPS printing and blocking phases enables dynamic control of layer thickness, allowing customized and adaptive design of the 3D structure slicing. The image-guided alignment system employs a homography transformation mechanism to map the projection and printing planes via image feedback, providing real-time mask alignment with microchannel geometries. We characterize the mapping accuracy and projection fidelity and demonstrate the capability of this method by direct in-channel fabrication of complex 3D microstructures such as pyramids, cuboids, bridge-like void structures, as well as multi-material patterns. We envision the multiphase flow-assisted in situ 3D printing to offer a versatile tool for spatially controlled, high-fidelity, and multi-material microfabrication within confined microchannels in novel lab-on-a-chip applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.