Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41674223›Full record

ArticleGM crops & food2026

The influence of GMO media strategies on public perceptions of CRISPR crop technologies in Southern Ontario.

Poornima Goudar, Alexander Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GM crops & food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Poornima GoudarDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-2066-5930
Alexander HallSchool of Interdisciplinary Life Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4115-6688

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have often divided public opinion, one factor influencing perceptions of GMO technologies has been misunderstood or poorly communicated scientific messaging. However, advancements in gene editing tools like CRISPR/Cas9 offer new crop modification possibilities, prompting different regulatory frameworks than traditional GMO technologies. This research examines public understanding of GMOs, awareness of CRISPR crops, and how prior experiences with GMOs shape perceptions of new genetic technologies. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining a public survey of adults in the Greater Toronto-Hamilton area and interviews with science journalists. Results show hesitance toward GMOs and CRISPR crops, with acceptance most impacted by consumer behavior and cost. Key interview themes include journalist's concerns about levels of public education, the role of social media, and the cost of goods. Our findings suggest increased transparency and effective communication could improve public acceptance of GMOs and CRISPR crops. While CRISPR crops do not come under the GMO regulatory framework in Canada, our findings show that the public does not recognize this distinction. Without increased transparency and more effective communication CRISPR crops may become widely associated with the negative media frames that have shaped perceptions of GMOs.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalPlants, Genetically ModifiedPublic OpinionGene EditingHumansOntarioCRISPR cropsgenetically modified organisms (GMOs)genetic engineeringpublic perceptionspublic understanding of sciencescience journalismscience policy

Identifiers

PMID41674223
PMCPMC12915814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.