Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41674112›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2026

Radiomics-based differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses on contrast-enhanced mammography: a reproducible workflow using open-source tools.

Aykut Teymur, Sibel Kul, Ramazan Özgür Doğan, Hayati Türe, Temel Kayıkçıoğlu, Onur Bektaş, Sinan Erdemi, Cemal Aydoğan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aykut TeymurUniversity of Health Sciences Türkiye, Antalya City Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, Antalya, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-6035-4375
Sibel KulKaradeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Trabzon, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-0174-2634
Ramazan Özgür DoğanTrabzon University Faculty of Computer and Information Sciences, Department of Artificial Intelligence Engineering, Trabzon, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-6415-5755
Hayati TüreTrabzon University Faculty of Computer and Information Sciences, Department of Computer Engineering, Trabzon, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-3012-8016
Temel KayıkçıoğluKaradeniz Technical University Faculty of Engineering, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Trabzon, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-6787-2415
Onur BektaşKaradeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Trabzon, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-4761-7668
Sinan ErdemiUniversity of Health Sciences Türkiye, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-6973-6655
Cemal AydoğanSadıka Sabancı State Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, Sakarya, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-0383-1120

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo differentiate benign and malignant breast masses by extracting radiomic features from low-energy and recombined contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiple machine learning classifiers.

methodsIn this retrospective, single-center study, 145 patients who underwent CEM between February 2019 and January 2022 were included. Radiomic features were extracted from manually segmented regions of interest on low-energy and recombined images using an open-source workflow (ITK-SNAP and PyRadiomics). The dataset was split at the patient level into a training set (75%) and an independent test set (25%); within the training set, feature selection and model optimization were performed using 10-fold cross-validation. Diagnostic performance [as measured by area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value] was reported on the held-out independent test set.

resultsEnsemble learning demonstrated the best performance for both image types. The highest accuracy and AUC were 91.8% and 0.978 for recombined images and 89.7% and 0.968 for low-energy images, respectively. For recombined images, ensemble learning yielded the highest sensitivity (91.8%), whereas neural networks achieved the highest specificity (95.8%). For low-energy images, ensemble learning reached the highest sensitivity (98.0%), and decision trees achieved the highest specificity (91.7%).

conclusionRadiomics analysis of CEM images can effectively differentiate between benign and malignant breast masses, potentially enhancing diagnostic accuracy in breast imaging. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A radiomics workflow based on recombined CEM images and open-source tools may complement conventional CEM interpretation, improve non-invasive lesion characterization, and support further research toward clinically validated decision-support applications.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammographyRadiomicsAdultAgedContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMachine LearningMiddle AgedRadiographic Image EnhancementReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityWorkflowContrast MediaBreast neoplasmscomputer-aided diagnosiscontrast-enhanced mammographymachine learningradiomics

Identifiers

PMID41674112
PMCPMC13530657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.