ArticleThe Journal of physiology2026
Modulation of slow and fast oscillations by direct current stimulation in the cerebral cortex in vitro.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multi-Scale Computational Framework for Evaluating Wireless Neuromodulation Feasibility via Magnetoelectric Nanoparticles.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Magnetoelectric Nanoparticles Enable Modulation of Cortical Networks by Low-Intensity Static Magnetic Fields In Vitro.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A microfluidic perspective on conventional in vitro transcranial direct current stimulation methods.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2023Review
- Deterministic and Stochastic Components of Cortical Down States: Dynamics and Modulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Modulation of intercolumnar synchronization by endogenous electric fields in cerebral cortex.Science advances · 2021Article
- Up and Down States During Slow Oscillations in Slow-Wave Sleep and Different Levels of Anesthesia.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
- Biophysically grounded mean-field models of neural populations under electrical stimulation.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Control of cortical oscillatory frequency by a closed-loop system.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2019Article
- An ultra-compact integrated system for brain activity recording and stimulation validated over cortical slow oscillations in vivo and in vitro.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation, are used in the treatment of neurological disorders. However, the mechanisms by which electric fields modulate cortical network activity are only partially understood. Our aim was to determine the modulation of spontaneous cortical activity by static electric fields and their underlying network mechanisms, which we investigated in vitro and in silico. Neocortical slices were exposed to constant fields of varying intensities and directions. We measured their effect on slow oscillations (SOs, <1 Hz), which consist of Up (active) and Down (silent) states, and on the high-frequency content (β: 15-30 Hz, γ: 30-90 Hz) during Up states. We found that DC fields ranging from -6 to +6 V/m induced an exponential increase in the frequency of SOs through the regulation of neuronal excitability and the duration of Down states, while hardly affecting Up state duration. A computational model based on the mean-field theory of attractor dynamics provided a mechanistic and quantitative description of the network dynamics underlying such precise modulation of slow oscillatory frequency. The modulation of high frequencies by positive DC fields was less consistent, the high-frequency power varying with the intensity of the fields only in a fraction of slices. Negative DC fields of increasing intensities progressively and effectively reversed the kainate-induced high-frequency power. DC fields precisely modulate emergent cortical network activity even through millivolt-scale effects on individual neurons. This effect is specific for different parameters of cortical oscillations. We discuss the underlying mechanisms and implications. KEY POINTS: We studied the impact that direct current (DC) electric fields had on the slow (<1 Hz) and fast (β: 15-30 Hz and γ: 30-90 Hz) frequencies spontaneously generated by the cerebral cortex in vitro. We found that weak (<6 V/m) DC fields can control the frequency of slow oscillations generated by the cortical network, and we explored the underlying mechanisms both experimentally and in a computer model. We conclude that, despite producing only millivolt-scale effects at the single-neuron level, DC fields can robustly modulate cortical population activity, with efficacy varying across frequency bands. These findings are relevant for the design of effective tDCS protocols for therapeutical purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.