ReviewThe New phytologist2026
Masters of perception: phosphorylation-dependent signaling in plants.
Review in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plants are masters of perception, reacting to a myriad of biochemical and physical cues in a constantly changing environment. Plants rely on local cell-based signal processing to perceive and react sufficiently fast to a multitude of stimuli. The ability to respond quickly is crucial for sustaining growth, defense, and metabolism and thereby the ability to survive challenges associated with pathogens, resource limitations, environmental fluctuations, and mechanical perturbations. Protein phosphorylation networks are prominent in mediating these fast responses, shaping the cellular response. In the past decade, plant sciences have moved our understanding of these networks further; however, current understanding is largely limited to minutes- and hour-long timescales, and hardly illuminates the (sub-)second timescales at which the initial signaling processes take place. In this Tansley insight, we discuss how quantitative mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics can be utilized to study the rapid and dynamic initial steps of protein phosphorylation networks in plants. We highlight rapid responses and show how bioinformatic approaches and the integration of other proteomics approaches can be utilized to deconvolve phosphorylation-based signaling in a data-driven approach. We offer an outlook on how to experimentally address rapid signaling and hope to inspire new approaches in the study of phosphorylation-dependent plant signaling networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.