ArticlePalliative & supportive care2026
Blood cancer caregivers' communication with clinicians about online cancer information.
Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAdult children caring for a parent with cancer often assume the role of a "surrogate seeker," looking online for information regarding their parent's diagnosis, which they may then discuss with their parent's clinician. The current study aims to apply the previously developed "Stoplight typology" to explore caregivers' experiences discussing online health information with their parents' clinicians and factors associated with each response type within the typology.
methodsWe conducted an online survey of adult children caring for a parent with a blood cancer about their experiences communicating with their parent and their parent's clinicians. We used regression analyses to examine the association between physician responses as categorized according to the stoplight typology with 3 caregiver communication measures assessing eHealth literacy, caregiver communication, and physician-caregiver and patient communication. Second, we examined the experiences participants had with clinician communication about online health information.
resultsA total of 121 caregivers completed the survey. Over half reported clinicians giving green light responses, with fewer reporting yellow or red light responses. Lower eHealth literacy significantly predicted greater likelihood of red light responses, whereas higher self-reported communication skills predicted more green light and fewer red light responses; neither communication measure predicted yellow responses. Thirty-two percent did not discuss their most recent online search with clinicians, most commonly because they saw no need. Seventy-four percent had discussed online information with a clinician, and 56% of these encounters were coded as green light responses. Among caregivers who had been told not to search online, 77% continued to do so despite the clinician's discouragement.
conclusionsThe study findings provide support for the stoplight typology in a caregiver population. Although most clinician responses were engagement responses, results demonstrate that the rejection response is ineffective. Future research could examine caregivers who reported lower eHealth literacy to target for future intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.