ArticleSystematic reviews2026
Effects of exercise training among adults with multiple sclerosis: protocol for a systematic review that informs an updated prescriptive guideline.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResearch demonstrates that exercise training is both safe and beneficial for individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). This is a timely opportunity to update the guidelines for exercise training in MS, as the number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effects of exercise training on a range of functional and biomedical outcomes among adults with MS has increased substantially in the past decade. The evidence for updating the guidelines should be gathered through rigorous methodology, thereby ensuring a comprehensive analysis. The objective of this systematic review of the literature will be to evaluate the type and dose of exercise training necessary to improve fitness, biomarkers of health and disease, physical and cognitive functions, symptoms of MS, quality of life, and/or participation in activities of daily life among adults with MS presenting with mild, moderate, or severe disability.
methodsThis protocol for a systematic review follows the PRISMA-P guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO. RCTs of chronic exercise interventions for people with MS will be included. Studies will be excluded if they focus on other neurological conditions, interventions, or if their data are solely qualitative. A systematic and comprehensive search will be conducted across eight electronic bibliographic databases. Retrieved references will be screened by two authors. Data will be extracted into piloted tables and synthesized qualitatively. Methodological quality of the included studies will be determined using the Tool for the Assessment of Study Quality and Reporting in Exercise (TESTEX), and risk of bias will be assessed through the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs (RoB 2). Finally, the certainty of evidence provided for the outcomes of interest across studies will be evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. DISCUSSION: The evidence gathered and analyzed through this review will be crucial for our next step of updating the exercise guidelines for MS. These updated guidelines will provide people with MS, their families and/or their caregivers, and health care professionals and MS services organizations or advocates, with clear information to promote exercise training among patients with MS. This will subsequently facilitate implementation of exercise training programs into MS care. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42025628825.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.