ArticleBMC research notes2026
Validation of the Spanish version of the social and emotional loneliness scale for adults - short form (SELSA-S) in older adults.
Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo adapt the response format and validate the factor structure of the Spanish SELSA-S for use with older adults.
resultsA total of 147 older adults (127 female; age range 65 to 90 years) participated in the study, all of whom lived independently in their homes. Of these, 11% were classified as socially isolated. The sample included 62 participants (42%) from urban areas and 85 (58%) from rural areas of the Pyrenees in La Rioja, Spain. The SELSA-S scale showed variable internal consistency, with alpha and omega coefficients ranging from 0.54 to 0.95 across models and subscales. Convergent and discriminant validity were supported by expected correlation patterns with other loneliness measures and unrelated constructs. No significant associations were found between SELSA-S scores and age. Among the tested models, the original three-factor structure, distinguishing family, social, and romantic loneliness, showed the best fit, despite an elevated RMSEA and negative loadings for two items in the romantic domain. Inter-domain correlations revealed moderate associations between family and romantic loneliness, while social loneliness remained largely independent. These findings support the SELSA-S as a suitable tool for assessing multidimensional loneliness in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.