Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41673911›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2026

Validation of the Spanish version of the social and emotional loneliness scale for adults - short form (SELSA-S) in older adults.

Blanca Bartolomé, Manuel Torres, María González-Álamos, Luis Vivanco

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Blanca BartoloméCenter for Biomedical Research of La Rioja, Rioja Health Foundation (FRS), Logroño, 26006, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5423-9939
Manuel TorresCenter for Biomedical Research of La Rioja, Rioja Health Foundation (FRS), Logroño, 26006, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0471-8826
María González-ÁlamosCenter for Biomedical Research of La Rioja, Rioja Health Foundation (FRS), Logroño, 26006, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5769-4299
Luis VivancoCenter for Biomedical Research of La Rioja, Rioja Health Foundation (FRS), Logroño, 26006, Spain. lvivanco@riojasalud.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3747-6240

Funding

POCTEFA EFA060/01-CO-BIEN
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo adapt the response format and validate the factor structure of the Spanish SELSA-S for use with older adults.

resultsA total of 147 older adults (127 female; age range 65 to 90 years) participated in the study, all of whom lived independently in their homes. Of these, 11% were classified as socially isolated. The sample included 62 participants (42%) from urban areas and 85 (58%) from rural areas of the Pyrenees in La Rioja, Spain. The SELSA-S scale showed variable internal consistency, with alpha and omega coefficients ranging from 0.54 to 0.95 across models and subscales. Convergent and discriminant validity were supported by expected correlation patterns with other loneliness measures and unrelated constructs. No significant associations were found between SELSA-S scores and age. Among the tested models, the original three-factor structure, distinguishing family, social, and romantic loneliness, showed the best fit, despite an elevated RMSEA and negative loadings for two items in the romantic domain. Inter-domain correlations revealed moderate associations between family and romantic loneliness, while social loneliness remained largely independent. These findings support the SELSA-S as a suitable tool for assessing multidimensional loneliness in older adults.

Indexed as

EmotionsLonelinessPsychometricsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesLonelinessOlder adultsReliabilitySELSA-SValidity

Identifiers

PMID41673911
PMCPMC12998318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.