ArticleBMC urology2026
Automatic classification of kidney stone components based on smartphone microscopy and the GoogLeNet model.
Article in BMC urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo develop an automated classification system for urinary stone composition by integrating smartphone-based microscopic imaging (TIPSCOPE) with the GoogLeNet architecture, with the goal of enabling rapid, accurate, and cost-effective analysis of stone composition.
methodsA total of 140 surgically extracted kidney stone samples were collected and classified into four categories: calcium oxalate (66 cases), uric acid (32 cases), carbonate apatite (26 cases), and magnesium ammonium phosphate hexahydrate (16 cases). Microscopic images of the stones were acquired using the TIPSCOPE device paired with a Realme GT5 smartphone, resulting in a dataset of 840 images. The classification model was trained using the Adam optimizer, with 90% of the dataset allocated for training and 10% reserved for testing.
resultsThe overall accuracy of the system reached 85.7%. Performance metrics for each category were as follows: uric acid stones: F1 = 0.92 (precision = 0.90, recall = 0.95); magnesium ammonium phosphate hexahydrate stones: F1 = 0.95 (precision = 0.90, recall = 1.00); calcium oxalate stones: F1 = 0.86 (precision = 0.85, recall = 0.88); carbonate apatite stones: F1 = 0.69 (precision = 0.77, recall = 0.63).
conclusionThis study successfully developed a kidney stone composition classification system integrating a smartphone-based microscope with a deep learning model, achieving an overall classification accuracy of 85.7%. The system exhibited strong performance in classifying uric acid and magnesium ammonium phosphate hexahydrate stones. With its low cost, efficiency, and portability, this system offers an economical and practical diagnostic solution for resource-limited regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.