ArticleBMC cancer2026
A multi-branch ensemble learning framework for detection of non-small cell lung cancer via T-cell receptor sequencing.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly detection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is paramount for patient survival, but conventional diagnostics are often invasive. T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing of peripheral blood offers a non-invasive alternative by capturing the systemic immune response, but its complex data requires advanced analytical methods.
methodsWe propose a multi-branch ensemble learning framework to diagnose NSCLC using TCR sequencing data. It synergistically integrates three analytical branches: one quantifies repertoire-level features including diversity metrics, clonality indices, and gene usage patterns; one identifies convergent TCR clusters indicative of shared antigen recognition; and one employs a Transformer-based language model to capture sequence-level patterns in CDR3 regions. All repertoire-level features were standardized using Z-score normalization, and binary classification (NSCLC vs. Healthy) was performed through a stacking ensemble classifier.
resultsThe framework was validated on 150 early-stage NSCLC patients and 162 healthy controls from 7 independent sources (N = 312). Principal component analysis confirmed that samples cluster primarily by disease status rather than study source (Silhouette score: 0.293 for disease vs. 0.244 for study), indicating biological signal dominance over potential batch effects. To evaluate multi-center generalizability, the model was tested on two independent external cohorts: DB1 (Illumina MiSeq, N = 47) and DB2 (Adaptive Biotechnologies immunoSEQ, N = 45). The model achieved an AUC of 0.982 in DB1 and 0.941 in DB2, indicating robust performance across different clinical settings. Notably, validation on 35 independent NSCLC samples from Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital yielded a sensitivity of 91.4%, further supporting its potential for clinical application.
conclusionOur framework provides a powerful, accurate, and interpretable tool for non-invasive NSCLC detection. By capturing a holistic picture of the anti-tumor immune response through complementary analytical branches, this work offers a promising step toward liquid biopsy-based cancer screening. Further validation in larger, multi-center prospective cohorts is essential before clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.