Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41673737›Full record

ArticleConflict and health2026

Intervention provision and engagement in Colombia's PAPSIVI - a national psychosocial support service for over half a million victims of armed conflict.

Charlotte Constable Fernandez, Alida Acosta-Ortiz, María Camila García Durán, Elisavet Pappa, Rob Saunders, Francesca Solmi, William Tamayo-Agudelo, Fabio Idrobo, Vaughan Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conflict and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Charlotte Constable FernandezClinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Alida Acosta-OrtizUniversidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
María Camila García DuránSalud Poblacional, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.
Elisavet PappaClinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Rob SaundersClinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Francesca SolmiDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
William Tamayo-AgudeloClinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Fabio Idrobo *Salud Poblacional, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.
Vaughan Bell *Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK. vaughan.bell@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/X012808/1Wellcome Career Development Award 225993/Z/22/ZWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColombia's PAPSIVI program is the world's largest psychosocial support service for victims of armed conflict providing support for over half a million civilians. However, service delivery has only previously been examined in small studies, making it difficult to understand to what extent PAPSIVI delivers interventions that are adequately targeted to individuals with the most serious exposures to the armed conflict, and to what extent attendees remain engaged with interventions.

methodsWe investigated how different conflict exposures related to PAPSIVI intervention assignment and engagement. We linked anonymised national data from the register of victims of the Colombian armed conflict to data from N = 534,818 PAPSIVI attenders. Analysis used logistic and linear regression with cluster robust standard errors, adjusted for a range of potential confounders.

resultsIntervention types were broadly provided in line with PAPSIVI guidelines, with victims experiencing torture, sexual violence, and forced recruitment more likely to receive individual sessions, while community-level impacts received community interventions. Female sex, ethnic minority status, and receiving state-subsidised healthcare were associated with higher intervention engagement. Those with previous mental health diagnoses had increased odds of attending individual or family sessions but lower odds of group or community sessions, consistent with recommendations for more intensive intervention for those with higher mental health needs. 29% of individual session attendees only received a single session, potentially indicating early dropout or unsuitable service provision for a proportion of attendees.

conclusionsThis study provides insights into support provision for civilian victims of conflict indicating that psychosocial support provision can be managed effectively at very large scales.

Indexed as

ConflictHealth disparitiesLatin americaService evaluationViolenceWar

Identifiers

PMID41673737
PMCPMC12998117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.