ArticleBMC medical education2026
The mediating role of knowledge conversion between digital literacy and scientific creativity among medical students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDigital literacy and scientific creativity are becoming significant concerns in the cultivation of professional and innovative talents within medical higher education, particularly given the widespread application of digital technology in modern medicine. Although existing studies suggest a link between digital skills and students’ performance, research specifically focusing on the relationship between digital literacy and scientific creativity remains limited. Furthermore, the internal mechanisms through which digital literacy influences scientific creativity have not been clearly elucidated. Knowledge conversion, as conceptualized in the SECI model, may mediate this relationship. This study aims to explore the relationship between digital literacy and scientific creativity among medical students and assesses the mediating role of knowledge conversion and its four dimensions.
methodsA cross-sectional survey of 770 medical students from Central South University (December 2024 to March 2025) was conducted using digital literacy scales, scientific creativity scales, and knowledge conversion scales. SPSS 24.0 and AMOS software were used to analyze the data, with mediating effects specifically examined via the Hayes PROCESS macro.
resultsDigital literacy exhibited a significant positive effect on medical students’ scientific creativity. Mediation analysis revealed that knowledge conversion served as a significant mediator, explaining the vast majority of this effect, which underscores its role as a primary pathway. However, a significant direct effect of digital literacy remained, thus confirming a partial mediation model. Among the dimensions of knowledge conversion, externalization emerged as the most potent mediator.
conclusionsThis study highlights the significant role of digital literacy in directly enhancing the scientific creativity of medical students, as well as the mediating effect of knowledge transformation, particularly in its externalization dimension. The findings provide valuable insights for educational interventions, indicating that strategies should not only focus on digital skills but also integrate knowledge management training. Furthermore, the proposed DLSC-SECI model provides a theoretical framework for systematic training aimed at improving the scientific creativity of medical students in the digital era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.