ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2026
Exploring the psychological well-being construct and validating the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving in Singapore.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- EQ-5D-5L population norms for Singapore: a household survey-based analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPositive psychological functions are associated with various health and life outcomes. This study examined the construct of psychological well-being in the multi-ethnic Singaporean population and evaluated the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) scale that captures 18 aspects of psychological well-being.
methodA two-wave survey study was carried out with 1349 community-dwelling Singaporean adults, of whom 562 completed the second wave. We compared factor structures that have been reported in other populations. The factor model was further tested for replicability in a subsequent household survey sample (N = 1756).
resultsA new higher-order factor model emerged in the Singaporean sample consisting of three dimensions: interpersonal well-being, individual well-being, and resistance to threats. The new structure demonstrated gender and age measurement invariance. CIT and the three dimensions had expected associations with mental health symptoms, work/study stress, and participants’ actual social support. The new higher-order factor model was replicated in the subsequent household survey sample. Finally, both CIT and its short form, the Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT), showed convergent validity, reliability and test-retest reliability in the Singaporean population.
conclusionsCIT demonstrated some evidence of construct validity and reliability in the current large samples of Singaporean community-dwelling adults. BIT can be an efficient tool to assess and monitor population general well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.