ArticleBMC nursing2026
Comparison of high-fidelity simulation combined with moulage and model-based visual teaching methods on the development of nursing students' oral assessment skills.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to compare the effects of high fidelity simulation combined with moulage and low fidelity simulation supported by visuals on nursing students’ oral assessment knowledge, skill levels, satisfaction and self-confidence.
methodsWhile oral mucosal wound images were used in the simulation applications of the students in the control group, moulage was used in the intervention group.
resultsA subsequent comparison of the post-intervention skill scores of the control and intervention groups revealed that the arithmetic mean of the former was 12.40, while the arithmetic mean of the latter was 17.31. The post-intervention skill scores of the intervention group were found to be significantly higher than those of the control group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, this study found that the simulation design scale scores of students who received training with moulage were higher than those who received training with mouth sore visuals.
conclusionsIt can be concluded that simulation with moulage is effective in developing the skills of nursing students receiving training for oral assessment and transferring what they have learned to the clinical environment. THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Integrating moulage into simulation-based nursing education can be an effective strategy to strengthen students’ oral assessment competencies and support the transfer of learning to clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.