ArticleBMC public health2026
The associations between residential environment and atopic dermatitis of adults: a prospective cohort study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAtopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease affected by environmental factors. However, the influence of residential environment space on AD has not been well understood. This study aimed to investigate the potential associations between environment space with AD.
methodsThis study analyzed data from 422,899 participants from the UK Biobank, with 2,462 incident cases of AD documented over a median follow-up of 12.45 years. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between residential environment space and the risk of developing AD.
resultsThe risk of AD was negatively associated with the percentage of green space, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.91) for the highest quartile within a 300 m buffer. In contrast, the risk was positively associated with exposure to blue space, with a HR of 1.33 (95% CI: 1.19, 1.49) for the highest quartile within a 300 m buffer and 1.62 (95% CI: 1.45, 1.80) within a 1000 m buffer. Joint analysis indicated that participants with high exposure to green space and low exposure to blue space exhibited the lowest risk of developing AD, compared to those with low exposure to green space and high exposure to blue space [300 m buffer: 0.50 (0.31, 0.82); 1000 m buffer: 0.61 (0.46, 0.81)].
conclusionHigher exposure to green space was found to be protective against AD, while higher exposure to blue space may increase the risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.