ReviewMicrobial cell factories2026
Division of labour enables Yarrowia lipolytica synthetic consortia to achieve higher growth rates from starch.
Review in Microbial cell factories, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundYarrowia lipolytica is a promising host for a range of biotechnological applications. However, the costs and sustainability of common feedstocks limit the commercial viability of current bioproduction. Consolidated bioprocessing using plant biomass offers a desirable alternative to reduce costs and improve sustainability, though such approaches are often constrained in single-organism systems due to metabolic burden. Here, we have investigated the use of division of labour (DOL) in Y. lipolytica consortia for the degradation of starch, a common component of plant biomass.
resultsWe engineered a panel of strains expressing α-amylase and/or glucoamylase, with varying promoter and signal peptide combinations. We found that stronger expression led to higher metabolic burden, and that expressing both amylases imposed a greater burden than expressing either enzyme alone. When combining both amylase strains, we found that some consortia could achieve faster growth rates than the equivalent monoculture. The fastest growing consortium identified from the panel was scaled-up into flasks, where the consortium achieved the highest final biomass, although the fastest growth rate was achieved by the α-amylase strain alone.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that DOL is a promising strategy for degrading complex macromolecules in plant biomass, offering a potential route to more sustainable bioprocessing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.