ArticleScientific reports2026
Computational biomechanics of human knee joint in maximum voluntary isometric extension with focus on the role of joint center positioning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the biomechanical mechanisms of neuromuscular joint facilitation intervention in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) extension assesses knee quadriceps function, strength, neuromuscular recovery and rehabilitation programs. We use a musculoskeletal (MS) model of the lower limb that incorporates a finite element (FE) of a cadaver knee. Muscle/ligament/contact forces, tissue stresses/strains and passive reaction moments are computed while simulating MVIC extension in seated posture at three knee flexion angles (KFA) (30°, 60°, 90°). Three input parameters of MVIC extension moment, lever arm of the posteriorly-directed external force, and coactivation in knee flexors were each varied at four levels using a Taguchi orthogonal design. Sensitivity of output parameters to these input variables were estimated. The location of the joint center where moment equations are verified was also varied. Results demonstrated a significant increase in quadriceps, patellar tendon, and patellofemoral contact forces with KFA (p < 0.001) and MVIC moment (p < 0.001). Greater lever arm of the external force increased ACL forces. In contrast to OpenSim simulation of the same MVIC, changes in the joint center location affected only the passive reaction moments that varied to maintain equilibrium while the computed muscle forces and internal ligament/contact loads remained unchanged. Findings highlight inherent limitations in MS models that idealize the entire knee as a joint located at its center of rotation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.