ArticleMolecular systems biology2026
Genetic barcoding uncovers the clonal makeup of solid and liquid biopsies and their ability to capture intra-tumoral heterogeneity.
Article in Molecular systems biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biological basis and clinical translation prospects of circulating cell-free DNA in precision management of breast cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Mapping breast cancer lineage in radiation and immunotherapy using the REMAP mouse.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) is fueling tumor progression in breast cancer, as specific clones present within a tumor may have a selective advantage to colonize distant organs and escape therapy. Accurate sampling of ITH is therefore a pressing challenge in clinical oncology to adequately predict recurrence and inform rational and personalized therapies. Here, we used genetic barcoding to track the spatiotemporal composition of human breast cancer clones in six preclinical models-across two cell lines and four patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). This allowed a direct side-by-side quantitative comparison of both intra-tumor clonal composition and how that composition was reflected in needle biopsies and cell-free DNA (cfDNA). These analyses highlighted several biologically and clinically relevant findings. First, the use of barcoding revealed that clonal diversity in the center of non-necrotic primary tumors was significantly higher than in the periphery. Second, cfDNA barcode analysis suggested that DNA 'shedding' in the vasculature varied widely, not only depending on necrosis and tumor burden but also across models. Third, combining information captured in both solid and liquid biopsies can provide a more robust assessment of tumor clonal composition. Taken together, these results showcase the utility of these barcoded models to optimize the use of solid and liquid biopsies as surrogates of tumor heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.