ArticleScientific reports2026
Interpretable machine learning rationalizes carbonic anhydrase inhibition via conformal and counterfactual prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Multi-Isoform QSAR, PubChem Concordance, and Applicability-Domain-Guided Prioritization of Selective Human Carbonic Anhydrase I, II, IX, and XII Inhibitors.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Physics-Constrained Neural ODEs for MXene Bandgap Prediction with Conformal Uncertainty.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human carbonic anhydrase (hCA) isoforms IX and XII are promising anticancer targets. Yet, their selective inhibition remains elusive due to close similarity with the abundant hCA II, whose off-target inhibition causes harmful side effects. Here, we introduce an interpretable machine learning framework to predict inhibition across hCA II, IX, and XII. To address this issue, our approach combines rigorous data curation, systematic benchmarking of classical and deep learning models, and integration of conformal prediction for uncertainty quantification with counterfactual explanations for molecular interpretability. After extensive benchmarking, we find that Support Vector Machines with extended-connectivity fingerprints consistently outperform more complex models, underscoring the importance of data quality and validation over algorithmic complexity. Here, conformal prediction provides rigorous activity estimation, while counterfactual analysis rationalizes structural features governing isoform selectivity, together enabling interpretable guidance for inhibitor design. To further test our model capability, we examine it on SLC-0111, as a selective inhibitor, which leads to a compatible result with the experiment. Our model reiterates experimental findings that modifications in the tail region strongly affect molecular selectivity, emphasizing the tail group as a key structural determinant for differentiating inhibitor activity among hCA isoforms II, IX, and XII. To facilitate adoption, we also release CAInsight, a user-friendly software with a graphical interface for virtual screening and generative design of a selective hCA inhibition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.