ArticleScientific reports2026
Efficacy and safety findings of the EXTRA study in older adult EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients receiving afatinib as first-line treatment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The EXTRA trial was the first to identify predictive biomarkers for afatinib efficacy in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant NSCLC. We analyzed the clinical data of older adult patients before translational analysis. This prospective study involved untreated patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received afatinib at an initial dose of 40 mg/day, followed by stepwise dose reductions, ultimately reaching 20 mg administered every other day. Treatment efficacy and adverse events (AEs) were compared between non-older and older adult patients. Among the 103 patients, 71 were aged < 75 years, and 32 were aged ≥ 75 years. Despite increased dose reductions in the older adults, progression-free survival was comparable: 21.5 vs. 18.6 months for non-older and older adults, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached in either group; the 2-year OS rates were 82% and 75% in non-older and older adults, respectively. Median post-progression survival in patients administered second-line drug therapy was 14.3 and 11.2 months in non-older (n = 42) and older adults (n = 20), respectively. Among older adults, 31 (97%) patients experienced AEs of all grades, and only six patients had grade ≥ 3 AEs with no grade 5 AEs. Afatinib demonstrated comparable therapeutic efficacy and safety in older and non-older adult patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.Trial registration: UMIN-CTR identifier (UMIN000024935).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.