ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of commercial kits and purification approaches for DNA extraction from atmospheric samples for 3rd generation sequencing without amplification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a DNA extraction protocol for atmospheric bioaerosol samples collected on glass-fiber filters widely used in air quality monitoring. The protocol produces high-quality molecules suitable for third-generation sequencing and other applications. The initial protocol was developed and applied in a Bioaerosol campaign performed in Finland and Lithuania in 2021 using low-volume air samplers, which posed stringent requirements to the method sensitivity. The protocol included a phenol-chloroform step for DNA purification, thus involving aggressive reagents; it was also quite time consuming and laborious. The present study advances this protocol to exclude the use of hazardous chemicals by using the SPRI paramagnetic bead technology for DNA purification and compares it to several commercial extraction methods. Despite trailing in efficiency to the initial method, the new development proved to be more efficient than several column-based commercial kits. The updated protocol was effective for a relatively high mass ratio of biological material to filter material: 70 nanograms of potential DNA on the filter to one milligram of filter fiber, as detected with the initial phenol-chloroform-based method. However, the new approach was not effective for a mass ratio lower than 15 nanograms of potential DNA per milligram of the filter material. The applicability of the new protocol for preparation of samples for the 3rd generation sequencing was confirmed by subsequent processing of the samples with the Oxford Nanopore (ONT) GridION sequencer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.