ArticlePsychological research2026
Take me back: how the temporal relationship between cues shapes emotional memory retrieval.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emotionally intense events, such as those involving fear, anger, sadness, or joy, rarely occur in isolation. Instead, they are embedded within neutral moments, creating a dynamic, interconnected narrative. This study examined how the temporal dynamics of emotion shape what neutral content "carries" about an emotional experience via a unique paradigm designed to probe memory for different facets of an event, including specificity, emotionality, and temporal order. During an encoding phase, participants sequentially encoded image triplets: a neutral before-object, a negative or neutral middle-scene, and a neutral after-object, then rated the emotional valence of the middle-scene. Next, participants completed a retrieval phase wherein they were presented with either the before or after cue and asked questions regarding their memory for the triplet containing that object. Results across two independent samples largely converged in their findings that cueing with after content improved specificity, precision, and emotional integrity when retrieving a negative event. Results from the temporal-order memory task suggested a potential response bias, wherein participants indicated that the object on the screen was presented after the associated scene, regardless of valence. Our study provides new insights into how humans can form and subsequently retrieve a dynamic, interconnected narrative from significant life experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41673297What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.