ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimization of mix proportions and hydration study of high-strength concrete incorporating corn stalk ash and silica fume as supplementary cementitious materials.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanical and microstructural performance evaluation for cement-based mortar: calcined mud powder.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To mitigate environmental pollution caused by the indiscriminate disposal of corn stalks and cement production, this study utilized corn stalk ash (CSA) and silica fume (SF) as partial replacements for cementitious materials in the formulation of biomass ash high-strength concrete. The investigation focused on the effects of three key variables-CSA content, water-to-binder ratio (W/B), and sand-to-binder ratio (S/B)-on the compressive strength of corn stalk high-strength concrete(CSHC). Using an orthogonal experimental design, the analysis determined that the factors influenced the 28-day compressive strength in the following order: S/B > CSA content > W/B.The highest 28-day compressive strength of CHSC, measured at 109.7 MPa, was achieved under the conditions of 15% CSA content, a W/B ratio of 0.21, and an S/B ratio of 1.2. Characterization of hydration products in the highest-strength samples at 7 and 28 days was performed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS). The results revealed that the abundant reactive SiO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.