ArticleScientific reports2026
Fixations, blinks, and pupils differentially capture individual and interpersonal dynamics in role-asymmetric mutual gaze interaction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although eye cues have proven effective in simulated gaze contact, it remains unclear how and through which eye parameters people interpret and use such cues in real interactions. We developed a real-time dyadic paradigm that restricted interaction to the eye region and incorporated asymmetrical roles and temporally structured interaction phases. One partner (listener) experienced emotion-inducing sounds, while the other (observer), unaware of the timing or content, attempted to infer the listener's emotions solely from eye cues. Using a multi-measure approach, we analyzed fixation, blink, and pupil parameters in 25 dyads. Results showed that the parameters were shaped primarily by role- and phase-related processing demands rather than emotional valence. Blinks indexed role-specific processing demands, adapting to attentional priorities. Interpersonal blink synchronization decreased when partners' attentional goals diverged, underscoring its dependence on attentional coupling. Fixations reflected shared attention allocation across roles, marked by active visual exploration during mutual gaze phases. Pupil dilation signaled phase-dependent arousal and cognitive effort, particularly for observers. Together, these findings reveal differential sensitivity across eye parameters, extending from attention allocation to social cognition and interpersonal coordination, and highlight the need for multi-measure frameworks to model the eyes as an integrated system for real-time social communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.