ArticleScientific reports2026
Automated cone photoreceptor detection using synthetic data and deep learning in confocal adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) imaging enables the cone photoreceptor mosaic to be visualised in the living human eye. Performing quantitative analysis of these images requires identification of individual photoreceptors. This is typically performed by manual labelling, which is subjective, time consuming and not feasible on a large scale. Automated algorithms to replace manual labelling are required and deep learning-based methods provide an effective way of achieving this. However, this approach requires large volumes of annotated training data that are difficult to acquire. Synthetic data may help to bridge this lack of annotated training data. A U-Net configuration was trained using a large synthetic dataset of confocal AOSLO images generated using ERICA alongside a smaller dataset of real confocal AOSLO images (Milwaukee dataset). Model performance was assessed by calculating the Dice coefficient, a metric quantifying segmentation overlap, on both a real held-out test set and an independent real dataset (Oxford dataset). Results from this evaluation were benchmarked against expert labelling and two automated cone detection methods: a confocal convolutional neural network (CNN) (1), and a combined graph-theory and dynamic programming approach (2)). The mean Dice coefficient compared to manual labelling was 0.989 (U-Net), 0.989 (confocal CNN), and 0.985 (graph-theory and dynamic programming) on the held-out test set. On the independent Oxford dataset, the U-Net achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.962 compared to manual labelling. Results show performance that is comparable to the gold standard of manual labelling and two automated cone detection methods. Furthermore, we demonstrate generalisability of this approach on an independent real dataset with images from higher retinal eccentricities. This approach may be useful for quantitative analysis of the photoreceptor mosaic in patients with retinal disease to provide cell-specific imaging biomarkers from AOSLO images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.