ArticleScientific reports2026
The relationship of curing methods and curing temperatures with NaOH molarity and their effects on the behavior of geopolymer concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- An experimental study on the impact behavior of geopolymer concrete incorporating recycled asphalt pavement aggregate.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning based optimization of strength, durability, and carbon efficiency of fly ash-GGBS geopolymer concrete.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the mechanical performance of geopolymer concrete cured under various oven temperatures and ambient conditions, focusing on the interactions among curing regimes, alkaline activator molarities, and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) incorporation. In this context, the effects of variable parameters of curing types (ambient and oven) and temperature between 45 °C and 120 °C, molarity beween 8 M and 12 M, and GGBFS content between 5% and 20% on compressive, flexural, and tensile strength were investigated in the experimental program. The oven-cured samples contained no GGBFS and were cured at 45 °C, 60 °C, 90 °C, and 120 °C, whereas the ambient-cured mixes incorporated different GGBFS ratios. The findings revealed that the mechanical properties of GPC were significantly affected by both NaOH concentration and curing regime. The highest performance under oven curing was achieved with 12 M NaOH and 90 °C, while under ambient curing the highest performance was achieved by the mixture containing 12 M NaOH and 10% GGBFS. Although the samples cured under ambient conditions generally exhibited lower strength, this method has significant potential with an appropriate mixture design and offers a more sustainable alternative more energy-efficient. This study makes a significant contribution to establishing a balance between performance and environmental impacts in GPC design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.