ArticleScientific reports2026
Discovery of potential antiviral compounds and accelerating the therapeutic discovery against monkeypox virus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monkeypox virus is a zoonotic virus of the genus Orthopox viruses. It can be transmitted through direct or indirect contact with animals or infected ones. Owing similarity of pathogenesis with smallpox, the same drugs can be used for both viruses, but they are not specific and only help to relieve the symptoms only. Therefore, the absence of antiviral treatment or licensed vaccine highlights an urgent need, especially due to its rapid prevalence. The study screened the library of compounds to retrieve drug-like molecules that can act against monkeypox virus. The highly virulent target gene B8R having uniport ID Q3I8J0 was chosen. Targeting B8R is substantial for global health and can align with SDG 3 and awareness of disease management. The B8R was modelled via Artificial intelligence (AI) AlphaFold method and then exposed to a library of compounds. Complementary interactions in the active site were shown by molecular docking. The Complex-1 had the greatest binding affinity (–8.4 kcal/mol), followed by Complex-2 (–8.1 kcal/mol) and Complex-3 (–7.7 kcal/mol). After 125 ns, Complex-1 reached equilibrium at 7.5 Å RMSD, according to MD simulations, exhibiting stable ligand retention and reliable interactions with crucial residues Gly135 and Lys136. Complex-3 shown intermediate protein stability (6 Å RMSD) but notable ligand fluctuation (48 Å RMSF), while Complex-2 displayed increased protein RMSD (8 Å RMSD) and delayed ligand stabilisation (16 Å RMSF). These results were corroborated by PCA analysis, which showed that Complex-1 exhibits coherent structural development whereas Complex-2 and Complex-3 show scattered and compact trajectories, respectively. Complex-1 promise for Mpox viral inhibition was highlighted by the fact that it was the most stable and dynamically favourable contender overall. The N-terminal follows the folding trend. The insilico analysis not only proposed a potent compound but also provides deep insight into the behavior of protein. The proposed potent compound against this zoonotic virus can be helpful to combat the monkeypox virus by subjecting it further towards experimental investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.