Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41673234›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Psychosocial impacts of a mouse plague and ongoing psychological stress.

Aditi Mankad, Kerry Collins, Walter Okello, Lucy Carter, Peter R Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aditi MankadCSIRO Environment, GPO Box 2583, Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia. aditi.mankad@csiro.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7441-4634
Kerry CollinsCSIRO Environment, GPO Box 2583, Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia.
Walter OkelloCSIRO Environment, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Lucy CarterCSIRO Environment, GPO Box 2583, Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia.
Peter R BrownCSIRO Health & Biosecurity, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2020-21, parts of eastern Australia experienced a severe mouse plague, estimated to have caused up to AUD$1 billion worth of damage. Yet, the mental health impacts of such a pest plague are not empirically known. The present study sought to quantify and model the psychosocial impacts of the 2021 mouse plague and measure ongoing psychological stress two years post-plague, to provide insights into social impacts and mental wellbeing during a significant biosecurity incursion. An online survey (N = 1,691) measured key psychosocial impact metrics included psychological traits, emotional states (depression, disgust, embarrassment), perceptions of social impacts (response costs, attitudes), support (social, government), and perceived threat of future plague. A partially mediated path model accounted for 74% of variability observed in perceived severity of impacts and ongoing psychological stress. Severity of impacts was predominantly influenced by perceived response costs, negative mood states (i.e. depression) and disgust elicited by the odour of mice. The most influential direct predictors of ongoing psychological stress were depressive symptoms at the time of the plague, and concerns that a future mouse plague would be dangerous or catastrophic to oneself. This study provides empirical insights into both acute social impacts during a significant pest incursion, as well as ongoing psychological stress. Social impacts are rarely measured or modelled; yet these factors are critically important in understanding the effect of severe pest incursions on communities whose livelihoods often depend on the agricultural sector.

Indexed as

PlagueStress, PsychologicalAnimalsAustraliaDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiceSurveys and QuestionnairesAustraliaBiosecurityFarmingPest incursionPublic attitudesSocial science

Identifiers

PMID41673234
PMCPMC12972104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.