ArticleScientific reports2026
Psychosocial impacts of a mouse plague and ongoing psychological stress.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impacts of rodents in piggeries in Australia - review and pilot impact study.Pest management science · 2026Review
- A multi-dimensional assessment of the 2021 mouse plague in New South Wales, Australia: Economic impacts and policy responses.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2020-21, parts of eastern Australia experienced a severe mouse plague, estimated to have caused up to AUD$1 billion worth of damage. Yet, the mental health impacts of such a pest plague are not empirically known. The present study sought to quantify and model the psychosocial impacts of the 2021 mouse plague and measure ongoing psychological stress two years post-plague, to provide insights into social impacts and mental wellbeing during a significant biosecurity incursion. An online survey (N = 1,691) measured key psychosocial impact metrics included psychological traits, emotional states (depression, disgust, embarrassment), perceptions of social impacts (response costs, attitudes), support (social, government), and perceived threat of future plague. A partially mediated path model accounted for 74% of variability observed in perceived severity of impacts and ongoing psychological stress. Severity of impacts was predominantly influenced by perceived response costs, negative mood states (i.e. depression) and disgust elicited by the odour of mice. The most influential direct predictors of ongoing psychological stress were depressive symptoms at the time of the plague, and concerns that a future mouse plague would be dangerous or catastrophic to oneself. This study provides empirical insights into both acute social impacts during a significant pest incursion, as well as ongoing psychological stress. Social impacts are rarely measured or modelled; yet these factors are critically important in understanding the effect of severe pest incursions on communities whose livelihoods often depend on the agricultural sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.