ArticleScientific reports2026
Use large language model to enhance reasoning of another large language model through reward updated GRPO.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advancements in deep learning have significantly transformed natural language processing (NLP), enabling sophisticated reasoning and text generation. However, fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) for domain-specific tasks remains a challenge due to the need for curated datasets. This paper introduces a novel package that allows developers to generate reasoning data from any data source, enhancing LLM adaptability across various domains. Additionally, we propose an updated objective function for Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with a novel reward component to improve training efficiency and model performance. Instead of competing with a few universal benchmarks, we propose a framework to set custom reward functions and design experimental processes to converge on the custom reward function. To support further research, we publicly release our dataset and trained model, facilitating broader adoption and evaluation. Our contributions include (1) a publicly available package for reasoning data generation using LLMs, (2) an enhanced GRPO objective function with a novel reward mechanism, and (3) open access to the dataset and model to promote continued advancements in LLM training. By addressing key challenges in fine-tuning and optimization, our work provides valuable resources for the NLP community and contributes to improving reasoning capabilities in LLMs. Finally, we present results comparing model performance on GSM8K and Warren Buffett Letters datasets. The best-performing model, Qwen 2.5-3B-Instruct, achieved 98.2% and 98.5% mean token accuracy on the respective datasets, with a compute time of 40–42 hours and a cost of $78–$82.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.