ArticleNature2026
Transferable enantioselectivity models from sparse data.
Article in Nature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Practical Guide to Bayesian Optimization for Organic Chemists.Chem catalysis · 2026Article
- BONAFIDE: a Python framework for the calculation of local features for atoms and bonds in molecules.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- Transfer learning for reaction optimisation: overview of its applications and limits.Chemical science · 2026Review
- Predicting Enantioselectivity of Ruthenium-Catalyzed Ketone Hydrogenation with 3D Structure-Based Deep Learning.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- London Dispersion in Confined Chiral Ion-Pair Asymmetric Catalysis: From Background Interaction to Design Principle.Accounts of chemical research · 2026Article
- Benchmarking molecular representations and machine learning algorithms for asymmetric catalysis: a palladium-catalysed decarboxylative asymmetric allylic alkylation case study.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying a catalyst class to optimize the enantioselectivity of a new reaction, either involving a different combination of known substrate types or an entirely unfamiliar class of compounds, is a formidable challenge. Statistical models trained on a reported set of reactions can help predict out-of-sample transformations
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.