ArticleScientific reports2026
No-rank tensor decomposition via metric learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tensor decomposition of high-dimensional data often struggles to capture semantically or physically meaningful structures, particularly when relying on reconstruction objectives and fixed-rank constraints. We introduce a no-rank tensor decomposition framework based on metric learning, which replaces reconstruction objectives with a similarity-driven optimization. By combining a triplet loss with diversity and uniformity regularization, the method learns embeddings where distances naturally reflect semantic and physical relationships, supported by theoretical guarantees on convergence and metric properties. We evaluate the approach on diverse datasets, including face recognition (LFW, Olivetti), brain connectivity (ABIDE), and simulated physical systems (galaxies, crystals). In comprehensive comparisons against classical methods (PCA, t-SNE, UMAP), tensor decompositions (CP, Tucker, t-SVD), and deep learning models (VAE, DEC, transformer-based embeddings), our method produces embeddings that preserve physically and semantically relevant relationships and achieve competitive clustering performance. While transformers often excel in predictive accuracy on large datasets, our method provides interpretable embeddings and remains effective in small-data regimes where transformer training may be infeasible. This work establishes metric learning as a principled paradigm for tensor analysis, emphasizing physical interpretability and semantic relevance over pixel-level reconstruction, and offering an efficient and robust alternative in data-scarce scientific domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.