ArticleNature biomedical engineering2026
Injury and therapy in a human spinal cord organoid.
Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-assisted design of self-assembling peptide hydrogels for neural regeneration: Principles and opportunities.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- Special Issue "Molecular Advances in Biomarkers of Central Nervous System Diseases and Disorders".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Microtubules in Spinal Cord Injury: From Cytoskeletal Dysregulation to Therapeutic Regeneration.Journal of neurochemistry · 2026Review
- Transcriptomics Insights into Spinal Cord Injury for Therapy Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Mechanical Remodeling and Mechanosensing after Spinal Cord Injury: From Molecular to Translational Approaches.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Emerging strategies for spinal cord injury repair: stem cells, extracellular vesicles, biomaterials, and neuromodulation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Damage to the spinal cord can lead to irreversible paralysis and loss of sensory function, but translation of preclinical therapies remains elusive. We recently showed that bioactive supramolecular assemblies of peptide amphiphiles can reverse paralysis in an acute mouse model following severe spinal cord injury (SCI). Here we report the development of two human spinal cord organoid injury models to simulate SCI in vitro, a laceration of the organoid with a scalpel and a compressive contusion commonly used in preclinical models, both resulting in immediate neuronal death and the formation of glial scar-like tissue. Treatment of the injured organoids with the preclinical therapy suppressed the scar-like tissue and promoted significant axonal regeneration, as observed previously in vivo. With the inclusion of microglia into the spinal cord organoids, we demonstrate that the supramolecular nanomaterial reduced pro-inflammatory factors commonly associated with injury. The human spinal cord organoid models developed here could accelerate the discovery of therapies to treat SCI and possibly damage of other central nervous system tissues owing to trauma or disease.
Identifiers
41673139What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.