ArticleScientific reports2026
A deep residual 1D-CNN with self-attention for fraud transaction detection in virtual economies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As virtual economies in the metaverse continue to grow, the need for real-time risk assessment in financial transactions has become critical. Traditional fraud detection systems often face challenges in keeping pace with the complexity and speed of metaverse data. To address this, we introduce a real-time anomaly detection and risk classification model designed specifically for metaverse transactions. The model is based on a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) enhanced with residual connections and a self-attention mechanism, allowing it to focus on the most relevant features of each transaction for improved risk classification. We trained the model on benchmark metaverse financial datasets from Kaggle, achieving excellent results in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity when classifying transactions into three risk levels-low, moderate, and high. To validate its robustness, we also tested it on the widely used Credit Card Fraud Detection dataset, where it maintained strong performance. However, we acknowledge that perfect scores can sometimes indicate overly clean or predictable data. To address this, we conducted an ablation study by introducing controlled noise into the dataset, evaluating the model's ability to handle uncertainty and imperfections in real-world scenarios. To enhance interpretability, we analyzed feature importance across several CNN-based variations and assessed performance using confusion matrices, ROC curves, and t-SNE visualizations, which confirmed clear separation of risk levels in high-dimensional space. Further comparisons with other machine learning and deep learning models demonstrate the confidence and effectiveness of the proposed 1D-CNN architecture for financial fraud detection in the metaverse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.