Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41673105›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

CPAP and high-flow nasal oxygen also reduce lung, diaphragm, and accessory muscle injury in experimental self-inflicted lung injury.

Sonia Reveco, Felipe M Llancalahuen, Paola Caviedes, Andrés Silva, Javier Contreras, Carlos González, Benjamín Erranz, Agustín Pérez, Juan P Cruces, Daniel E Hurtado and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sonia RevecoUnidad de Paciente Crítico Pediátrico, Hospital El Carmen Dr. Luis Valentín Ferrada, Santiago, Chile.
Felipe M LlancalahuenLaboratory of Translational Research in Critical Care (LTRCC), Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Paola CaviedesUnidad de Paciente Crítico Pediátrico, Hospital El Carmen Dr. Luis Valentín Ferrada, Santiago, Chile.
Andrés SilvaLaboratorio de Genética y Patogénesis Bacteriana, Centro de Investigación de Resiliencia a Pandemias, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.
Javier ContrerasLaboratorio integrativo de Biomecánica y Fisiología del Esfuerzo (LIBFE), Escuela de Kinesiología, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Carlos GonzálezSchool of Veterinary Medicine, One Health Institute, Faculty of Life Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.
Benjamín ErranzDepartment of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Agustín PérezDepartment of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Juan P CrucesLaboratory of Translational Research in Critical Care, Center for Research on Pandemic Resilience, Faculty of Life Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.
Daniel E HurtadoDepartment of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Pablo CrucesUnidad de Paciente Crítico Pediátrico, Hospital El Carmen Dr. Luis Valentín Ferrada, Santiago, Chile. pcrucesr@gmail.com.

Funding

Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico 1220322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strenuous respiratory effort has been proposed as a second hit, introducing the concepts of “patient self-inflicted lung injury” (P-SILI) and underassistance myotrauma. We investigated the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) on inspiratory and expiratory effort, lung injury, and myotrauma of obligatory and accessory respiratory muscles in experimental P-SILI. In rats, lung injury was induced through surfactant depletion, followed by 3 h of standard oxygen therapy (2 L/min, positive control) or supported ventilation (CPAP 6 cmH2O, HFNO 4 L/min, and protective mechanical ventilation [MV, negative control] groups). Subjects were assessed through esophageal manometry, surface electromyography on the abdominal wall, thoracic ultrasound, plasma multiplex analysis, and histology on the lungs, diaphragm, and accessory inspiratory and expiratory muscles. Compared against standard oxygen therapy, the MV and CPAP groups resulted in lower inspiratory and expiratory efforts and diaphragm excursion. Furthermore, intragroup analysis showed that CPAP also reduced respiratory rate and prevented the loss of lung aeration. All support therapies prevented lung, diaphragm, and accessory muscle injuries, but with nuances. In lungs and accessory muscles, MV showed the highest injury protection and HFNO the lowest, while CPAP was the most protective for the diaphragm. Only MV resulted in a lower plasma GRO-α concentration than standard oxygen therapy. Invasive and non-invasive respiratory support therapies are effective in protecting the lungs and respiratory muscles, but the effect is stepped in the lung and varies between obligatory and accessory respiratory muscles.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureDiaphragmLungLung InjuryOxygenOxygen Inhalation TherapyRespiratory MusclesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMaleRatsOxygenAcute lung injuryContinuous positive airway pressureHigh-flow nasal oxygenPatient self-inflicted lung injuryRespiratory effortSpontaneous breathingUnderassistance myotrauma

Identifiers

PMID41673105
PMCPMC12972071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.