ArticleScientific reports2026
CPAP and high-flow nasal oxygen also reduce lung, diaphragm, and accessory muscle injury in experimental self-inflicted lung injury.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What I talk about when I talk about patient self-inflicted lung injury: an ultrastructural perspective.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Strenuous respiratory effort has been proposed as a second hit, introducing the concepts of “patient self-inflicted lung injury” (P-SILI) and underassistance myotrauma. We investigated the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) on inspiratory and expiratory effort, lung injury, and myotrauma of obligatory and accessory respiratory muscles in experimental P-SILI. In rats, lung injury was induced through surfactant depletion, followed by 3 h of standard oxygen therapy (2 L/min, positive control) or supported ventilation (CPAP 6 cmH2O, HFNO 4 L/min, and protective mechanical ventilation [MV, negative control] groups). Subjects were assessed through esophageal manometry, surface electromyography on the abdominal wall, thoracic ultrasound, plasma multiplex analysis, and histology on the lungs, diaphragm, and accessory inspiratory and expiratory muscles. Compared against standard oxygen therapy, the MV and CPAP groups resulted in lower inspiratory and expiratory efforts and diaphragm excursion. Furthermore, intragroup analysis showed that CPAP also reduced respiratory rate and prevented the loss of lung aeration. All support therapies prevented lung, diaphragm, and accessory muscle injuries, but with nuances. In lungs and accessory muscles, MV showed the highest injury protection and HFNO the lowest, while CPAP was the most protective for the diaphragm. Only MV resulted in a lower plasma GRO-α concentration than standard oxygen therapy. Invasive and non-invasive respiratory support therapies are effective in protecting the lungs and respiratory muscles, but the effect is stepped in the lung and varies between obligatory and accessory respiratory muscles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.