ArticleScientific reports2026
Sustainable assessment of renewable energy microgrid architectures using a probabilistic hesitant fuzzy MCDM approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The selection of an optimal microgrid architecture is critical for advancing sustainable and resilient energy systems, particularly in remote or off-grid regions. This study introduces a novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework that synergistically combines the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for determining criterion weights with the Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method for ranking competing microgrid configurations. To effectively address the ambiguity and variability inherent in expert evaluations, the proposed model is embedded within the Probabilistic Pythagorean Hesitant Fuzzy Set (PPyHFS) environment. This allows for a nuanced representation of expert judgments by incorporating degrees of membership, non-membership, hesitation, and their associated probabilities. Seven distinct microgrid alternatives–ranging from conventional solar photovoltaic (PV) systems to advanced hybrid configurations such as hydrogen-integrated and pico-hydro models–are systematically evaluated against key sustainability criteria, including cost-effectiveness, operational reliability, environmental impact, scalability, and technological maturity. The integration of PPyHFS into the AHP–ARAS structure enhances decision-making robustness under uncertainty. Results identify the Hydrogen-based Microgrid as the most favorable configuration, followed by the Wind + Solar Hybrid and Solar PV + Biogas Hybrid systems. The proposed framework serves as a comprehensive and adaptable decision-support tool for energy planners, engineers, and policymakers engaged in the design and deployment of next-generation sustainable microgrid solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.