Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41673081›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026

Itacitinib in advanced hepatocellular cancer following first line therapy.

Alessandro Troiani, Lingshan Hung, David J Pinato, Maria Martinez, Debashish Sarker, Caroline Ward, Hooshang Izadi, Rob Goldin, Mathew Vithayathil, Sultan Alharbi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alessandro Troiani *Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK.
Lingshan Hung *Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK.
David J PinatoDivision of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK.
Maria MartinezDivision of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK.
Debashish SarkerDepartment of Medical Oncology, King's College London, London, UK.
Caroline WardDivision of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK.
Hooshang IzadiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Rob GoldinDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Mathew VithayathilDivision of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK.
Sultan AlharbiDivision of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK.
Haonan LuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.
Rohini SharmaDivision of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK. r.sharma@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) develops on background chronic liver disease where uncontrolled inflammation drives hepatocarcinogenesis. First-line therapies have limited response. There are no agents that specifically target the underlying liver inflammation. We investigated the safety and efficacy of itacitinib, a highly selective JAK1 inhibitor, as a potential second- or third-line therapy. Biomarkers of response were investigated. Participants with advanced stage HCC, Child Pugh ≤B7 who had progressed through at least one previous line of therapy received 400 mg of itacitinib QID every 28 days. Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were assessed weekly during cycle 1 then every 28 days (CTC-AE version 4.03). Response was assessed 8-weekly using RECIST 1.1. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were reported as secondary endpoints. Tumour samples were analysed for targeted transcriptomics. Sequential serum samples were assessed for metabonomic determinants of toxicity and response. 19 patients were enrolled. The most common trAEs were thrombocytopenia (31%), fatigue (26%) and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (26%); four episodes of dose-limiting thrombocytopaenia were observed. Over a median follow-up of 3.5 months, the best overall response was stable disease (47%). Median PFS and OS were 3.5 (95% CI: 2.6 - 4.5 months) and 7.4 months (95% CI: 4.3-10.5 months), respectively. Subgroup analysis illustrated a significantly increased risk of progression for patients that had received combination immunotherapy prior to itacitinib (HR 4.7, 95%CI 1.3-16.6, p = 0.016). Untargeted tumour and serum transcriptomics identified a signature predictive of response. Itacitinib either as second- or third-line therapy showed promising activity. We identified a transcriptomic signature predictive of response.

Identifiers

PMID41673081
PMCPMC12905154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.