ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Itacitinib in advanced hepatocellular cancer following first line therapy.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) develops on background chronic liver disease where uncontrolled inflammation drives hepatocarcinogenesis. First-line therapies have limited response. There are no agents that specifically target the underlying liver inflammation. We investigated the safety and efficacy of itacitinib, a highly selective JAK1 inhibitor, as a potential second- or third-line therapy. Biomarkers of response were investigated. Participants with advanced stage HCC, Child Pugh ≤B7 who had progressed through at least one previous line of therapy received 400 mg of itacitinib QID every 28 days. Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were assessed weekly during cycle 1 then every 28 days (CTC-AE version 4.03). Response was assessed 8-weekly using RECIST 1.1. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were reported as secondary endpoints. Tumour samples were analysed for targeted transcriptomics. Sequential serum samples were assessed for metabonomic determinants of toxicity and response. 19 patients were enrolled. The most common trAEs were thrombocytopenia (31%), fatigue (26%) and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (26%); four episodes of dose-limiting thrombocytopaenia were observed. Over a median follow-up of 3.5 months, the best overall response was stable disease (47%). Median PFS and OS were 3.5 (95% CI: 2.6 - 4.5 months) and 7.4 months (95% CI: 4.3-10.5 months), respectively. Subgroup analysis illustrated a significantly increased risk of progression for patients that had received combination immunotherapy prior to itacitinib (HR 4.7, 95%CI 1.3-16.6, p = 0.016). Untargeted tumour and serum transcriptomics identified a signature predictive of response. Itacitinib either as second- or third-line therapy showed promising activity. We identified a transcriptomic signature predictive of response.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.