ArticleScientific reports2026
Estimating species commonness and prevalence through unsupervised methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prevalence of a species in a given area is crucial for estimating the environmental conditions associated with its subsistence within ecological niche models (ENMs). Prevalence is defined as the proportion of presences relative to the total number of sampled sites, reflecting prior expectation on species commonness or rarity. However, reliable estimation often faces challenges due to limited or biased occurrence data, particularly for rare or poorly monitored species. This work presents a data-driven, multi-species methodology to estimate species prevalence for use in ENMs. It leverages species occurrence records from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility and is entirely unsupervised. It utilises two clustering methods, one deep-learning model, and an ensemble model, plus statistical analysis to classify species commonness and transform classifications into prevalence probabilities. A case study is presented for 161 species living in the Massaciuccoli Lake basin (Tuscany, Italy), a wetland of high biodiversity value and ecological sensitivity. The models classified the species' prevalence based on observations from other Italian wetland sites, and were evaluated against expert-based assessments. All models achieved high accuracy, with the deep-learning model achieving the highest (~ 81-90%). The proposed methodology is scalable and reproducible and can inform ENMs with objective, robust prevalence estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.