ArticleScientific reports2026
The magnitude and population burden of educational inequalities in adverse birth outcomes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We aimed to describe the magnitude and population burden of inequality in adverse birth outcomes by maternal education (five categories). Data from 639,007 singleton births of gestational age ≥ 24 weeks or, if missing, birthweight ≥ 500 g were included from the National registry of the Netherlands, 2016-2019. One in six Dutch births had an adverse outcome. Each step down the educational ladder was associated with higher adverse outcome rates. Inequalities in stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates were large between the highest (Master's or higher) and lowest (primary) educated groups (rate ratio [RR] = 2.94 [95%CI: 2.33-3.55] and 2.25 [1.71-2.79], respectively). Inequalities were smaller for preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age, low Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and severe congenital anomalies (RR range = 1.32-1.77; PAF range = 13.8-17.7%). Mortality would reduce by a third if the entire population had the mortality rates of the highest educated (population attributable fraction [PAF]
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.