ArticleScientific reports2026
Experimental and numerical evaluation of the mechanical behavior of alkali-activated slag concrete with recycled waste glass and dealuminated metakaolin powders.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of mineralogical composition on the compressive strength and microstructure of metakaolin geopolymer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the mechanical performance of ambient-cured Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete (AASC) incorporating different coarse aggregates (dolomite and basalt), recycled waste glass powder (WGP), dealuminated metakaolin (DK), and steel fibers (SF). An experimental program was conducted to assess the mechanical properties of the investigated mixes. Microstructural characteristics were also examined using SEM-EDX analysis to support the interpretation of mechanical trends. Furthermore, finite element (FE) simulation models were developed in ABAQUS and validated against experimental results. The findings indicate that AASC incorporating 10% DK and 1% SF exhibits the highest overall mechanical performance. Based on the experimental results, a nonlinear Concrete Damaged Plasticity (CDP) model was developed and rigorously calibrated, enabling reliable FE simulation of AASC behavior. The validated model was subsequently employed in an extensive parametric study to investigate the flexural response of reinforced AASC beams, which demonstrated that the inclusion of 1% SF increased load-carrying capacity by approximately 46% while reducing mid-span deflection by about 19.7%. The results show that the optimized mixes, particularly those incorporating WGP + SF or DK + SF, achieved higher ultimate loads, reduced deflections, delayed crack initiation, and improved ductility. The proposed FE model accurately predicts load capacity and failure modes, providing a robust tool for future structural design and optimization of sustainable AASC elements utilizing industrial by-products and waste materials. The novelty of this study lies in the comprehensive investigation of recycled WGP and DK, each combined with SF in AASC, supported by integrated experimental and numerical analyses to elucidate their synergistic effects on mechanical behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.