ArticleScientific reports2026
A physics-informed graph neural network to approximate docking-based binding affinity for DYRK2 in Alzheimer's drug repurposing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Algorithms to Assets: A Comprehensive Review of AI's Role in Preclinical Drug Discovery and the Hurdles to Clinical Translation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) requires the discovery of new therapeutic targets, but traditional molecular docking methods for virtual screening are often computationally expensive. This study introduces PhysDual-GCN, a physics-informed graph neural network designed to approximate docking-derived binding affinity scores for DYRK2, an understudied yet biologically relevant target in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The model jointly processes ligand molecular graphs and a sequence-based graph representation of DYRK2, while explicitly incorporating Coulomb and Lennard-Jones interaction terms as analytical physical energy components. Because no experimentally measured binding affinities are available for DYRK2-drug pairs, all reference labels used for evaluation were obtained exclusively from widely used classical docking tools (AutoDock Vina, Smina, QVina, CB-DOCK). These tools exhibit an inherent uncertainty of approximately ± 0.5-1.5 kcal/mol, which constrains the interpretability of absolute deviations. PhysDual-GCN was trained solely on docking-derived scores and evaluated using a strict ligand-level separation to avoid circularity during model development. Due to the limited number of ligands (n = 4 FDA-approved AD drugs: brexpiprazole, donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine), the results should be viewed as agreement with computational references rather than generalizable predictive performance. The model achieved low absolute errors (MAE = 0.31 kcal/mol; RMSE = 0.44 kcal/mol) relative to the reference docking scores and correctly identified stronger binders such as donepezil (- 10.8 kcal/mol) and brexpiprazole (- 10.0 kcal/mol). These findings demonstrate that integrating physical interaction terms into a GNN framework can enhance interpretability while providing a computationally efficient surrogate for classical docking workflows. Overall, PhysDual-GCN offers a biologically meaningful and explainable approximation tool for DYRK2 interaction scoring. While the present results are constrained by the small number of compounds and the absence of 3D protein features, the approach establishes a foundation for future large-scale, experimentally validated studies in AD drug repurposing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.