ArticleScientific data2026
Seismocardiography Pig Hypovolemia Dataset for Signal Quality Indexing and Validated Cardiac Timings.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seismocardiography Pig Hypovolemia Dataset for Signal Quality Indexing and Validated Cardiac Timings.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Quantifying changes in triaxial seismocardiography variability due to sub-optimal volume status.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Seismocardiography (SCG), a non-invasive method for capturing cardio-mechanical signals, is often susceptible to noise and motion artifacts. Current approaches primarily use automated algorithms and machine learning techniques for signal quality indexing and fiducial point detection. However, validation is hindered by the scarcity of standardized, high-quality annotated datasets. To facilitate the manual annotation process of SCG signals, we developed an open-source graphical user interface, providing a simple, efficient, and accurate tool. Using data from a porcine hypovolemia protocol, we annotated SCG waveforms for signal quality scores and annotated cardiac timing intervals (e.g., aortic opening and aortic closing) with 17,059 SCG heart beats in total across six porcine subjects. Validating the rigor and consistency of annotations, performed analyses for inter-annotator agreements resulted high agreements achieving strong correlations against gold-standard catheter-based measurements for aortic opening (AO) (r = 0.926) and aortic closing (AC) (r = 0.911). This expertly annotated dataset supports advancements in real-time cardiac monitoring, denoising, and diagnostic applications, and enhances reproducibility and comparability in SCG research across the biomedical signal processing community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.