ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimal electric vehicle charging stations and distributed generation placement by partitioning the distribution network using the modified newman fast algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article introduces a novel and numerically validated framework for the well-optimized placement and capacity selection of Distributed Generation (DG) units and Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (EV-CSs) in power distribution networks (PDNs). The methodology employs a Modified Newman Fast Algorithm (NFA) enhanced with Electrical Coupling Strength (ECS) to partition the network into electrically cohesive Virtual Microgrids (VMs). Within each VM, resources are optimally allocated using two recent metaheuristic techniques: the Starfish Optimization (SFO) and the Puma Optimization (PO) methods and compared against the conventional Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) approach. Each approach is executed for 500 iterations with 30 search agents. The discussed framework is tested on the IEEE 33-bus and IEEE 118-bus PDNs. For the 33-bus PDN, the approach minimized active power losses by approximately 82%, improved the lowest bus voltage magnitude from 0.8361 p.u to 0.979 p.u, and increased the Stability Index (SI) from 0.6256 p.u to 0.927 p.u. For the 118-bus network, real-power losses were decreased by 68–69%, with notable enhancements in both voltage profile and SI. Additionally, PO demonstrated the fastest convergence speed among the tested algorithms, confirming its suitability for large-scale optimization. The study results demonstrate the effectiveness of the presented VM-based co-allocation strategy in enhancing power system performance and scalability, with future work focusing on cost-aware multi-objective optimization and real-world deployment in Egyptian PDNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.