ArticleScientific data2026
Biomedical Data Manifest: A lightweight data documentation mapping to increase transparency for AI/ML.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomedical machine learning (ML) models raise critical concerns about embedded assumptions influencing clinical decision-making, necessitating robust documentation frameworks for datasets that are shared via external repositories. Fairness-aware algorithm effectiveness hinges on users' prior awareness of specific issues in the data - information such as data collection methodology, provenance and quality. Current ML-focused documentation approaches impose impractical burdens on data generators and conflate data/model accountability. This is problematic for resource datasets not explicitly created for ML applications. This study addresses these gaps through a two-step process: First, we derived consensus documentation fields by mapping elements across four key templates. Second, we surveyed biomedical stakeholders across four roles (clinicians, bench scientists, data manager and computationalists) to assess field importance and relevance. This revealed important role-dependent prioritization differences, motivating the development of the Biomedical Data Manifest - a modular template employing persona-specific field presentation reducing generator burden while ensuring end-users receive role-relevant information. The Biomedical Data Manifest improves transparency for datasets deposited in public or controlled-access repositories and bias mitigation across ML applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.