Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41673000›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

Biomedical Data Manifest: A lightweight data documentation mapping to increase transparency for AI/ML.

Daniel Bottomly, Christopher G Suciu, Benjamin Cordier, Nathaniel Evans, Alfonso Poire, Christina Zheng, ARTNet Consortium, Jeffrey W Tyner, Alan Hutson, Shannon K McWeeney

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel BottomlyKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7191-0990
Christopher G SuciuKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Benjamin CordierKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Nathaniel EvansKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Alfonso PoireKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Christina ZhengKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
ARTNet Consortium
Jeffrey W TynerKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2133-0960
Alan HutsonRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Shannon K McWeeneyKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. mcweeney@ohsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8333-6607

Funding

Tumor Intrinsic and Microenvironmental Mechanisms Driving Drug Combination Efficacy and Resistance in AMLU54CA224019 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BRIAN J DRUKER, Shannon K. McWeeney · 2017 to 2026
$13.9M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA224019U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) 5R01CA247362-03U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) U54CA224019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical machine learning (ML) models raise critical concerns about embedded assumptions influencing clinical decision-making, necessitating robust documentation frameworks for datasets that are shared via external repositories. Fairness-aware algorithm effectiveness hinges on users' prior awareness of specific issues in the data - information such as data collection methodology, provenance and quality. Current ML-focused documentation approaches impose impractical burdens on data generators and conflate data/model accountability. This is problematic for resource datasets not explicitly created for ML applications. This study addresses these gaps through a two-step process: First, we derived consensus documentation fields by mapping elements across four key templates. Second, we surveyed biomedical stakeholders across four roles (clinicians, bench scientists, data manager and computationalists) to assess field importance and relevance. This revealed important role-dependent prioritization differences, motivating the development of the Biomedical Data Manifest - a modular template employing persona-specific field presentation reducing generator burden while ensuring end-users receive role-relevant information. The Biomedical Data Manifest improves transparency for datasets deposited in public or controlled-access repositories and bias mitigation across ML applications.

Indexed as

DocumentationMachine LearningAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41673000
PMCPMC13002863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.