ArticleInnovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)
Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Patient-Specific Direct 3D-Printed Aortic Valve for Simulation Trainings: A Comparative Study.
Article in Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the mechanical properties of 3-dimensional (3D)-printed patient-specific aortic models for surgical simulation. The objective was to analyze the effects of postcuring time and color pigments on material stiffness, flexibility, toughness, and durability and to identify the most suitable material and processing conditions to enhance the biomechanical realism of 3D-printed aortae.
methodsDirect 3D printing was used to fabricate patient-specific aortic models. Samples were prepared with different postcuring times (5, 10, 15, and 20 min) and with or without color pigments (pink and orange). Uniaxial tensile testing was conducted to analyze the mechanical properties, including tensile strength, stiffness, flexibility, and strain at failure, using stress-strain curves.
resultsUncolored samples with a postcuring time of 15 min demonstrated the best mechanical properties for simulation training, offering a balance between flexibility, stiffness, and toughness. Colored samples exhibited lower tensile strength, reduced toughness, and increased stiffness as compared with uncolored samples.
conclusionsMaterial selection and postprocessing play a crucial role in the biomechanical accuracy of 3D-printed patient-specific aortic models. Uncolored samples with a 15 min postcuring time are optimal for surgical simulation. Future research should focus on refining postprocessing techniques and directly comparing 3D-printed models with human aortic tissue to improve realism and validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.