SynthesisTranslational psychiatry2026
Fecal microbiota transplantation from psychiatric patients to mice - systematic review of methodologies and a call for standardization.
Synthesis in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing Gut Microbiota to Enhance Immunotherapy in NSCLC: From Mechanisms to Translational Applications.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Gut Microbiome Dysregulation Across Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: Bacteria-, Fungi- and Virome-Level Alterations with Molecular and Immunological Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Next-generation microbiome therapeutics: psychobiotics and fecal microbiota transplants for mental health treatment.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Chemotherapy-Induced Remodeling of the Gut Microbiota-Inflammation Axis: Implications for the Course of Bipolar Disorder.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has emerged as a key tool to explore the role of the microbiome-gut-brain axis in psychiatric disorders. However, the field is hindered by significant methodological inconsistencies.
methodsA comprehensive literature search identified 31 studies performing FMT from human patients with psychiatric conditions into rodent models.
resultsNone of the 31 studies followed an identical FMT protocol. Significant heterogeneity was observed across studies in rodent model selection, including germ-free, antibiotic-pretreated, or specific pathogen-free approaches, in antibiotic regimens, timing and microbiota depletion verification, as well as in FMT donor strategy, dosage, frequency, engraftment assessment, and behavioral testing schedules.
conclusionsThis review highlights the necessity for standardized methodologies in microbiome research. Evidence-based recommendations are provided to promote reproducibility in future work. Investigators are encouraged to publish transparent and rigorous protocols, to enhance the translational potential of microbiome-gut-brain axis research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.