SynthesisEuropean journal of sport science2026
Navigating the Data Processing Maze: A Systematic Review of Jump Height Calculations Using Force Platforms.
Synthesis in European journal of sport science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Navigating the Data Processing Maze: A Systematic Review of Jump Height Calculations Using Force Platforms.European journal of sport science · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vertical jump height estimates the ability to oppose gravity and lower body neuromuscular performance in athletes and various clinical populations. The use of force platforms for measuring jump height is increasingly popular due to technological advancements and the equipment's relative ease of use in various settings. However, when utilizing the force platform, ground reaction force (GRF) data must be processed to calculate jump height. While processing the GRF-time data, several factors could alter the data, leading to inaccurate jump height estimates. These factors include sampling frequency, filtering, cut-off frequencies of the filter, averaging periods of body weight, integration procedures, selection of take-off/landing thresholds, and selection of the gravity constant. These data processing steps can alter jump height estimates, with effects ranging from minor (< 0.5%) to major (> 25%). Despite some guidelines on data processing, there is no consistency in the literature or in practice regarding how the GRF-time data should be processed. Consequently, jump height without specifying the data processing steps may be of limited use to others. The aim of this review was to assist researchers and practitioners in navigating the complexities of data processing to better understand how it influences jump height.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.