ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Neural Tuning for Ordinal Processing: Convergent Patterns in Human Brains and Artificial Networks.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Processing ordinality, i.e., the rank of an item in a series such as 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc., is a fundamental skill shared by humans and animals. While humans often use symbolic sequences like numbers or letters, ordinality does not depend on language or symbols. Across species, ordinality plays a critical role in behaviors such as decision-making, foraging, and social organization. We hypothesize that ordinality perception is supported by neuronal tuning, i.e., neurons selectively responsive to specific ranks. Using ultrahigh-field 7 T fMRI and population receptive field (pRF) modeling in human participants (both female and male), we identified neural populations in parietal and premotor cortices that are tuned to nonsymbolic ordinal positions. Comparable with other sensory domains, tuning width increased with preferred ordinal rank, suggesting reduced precision and potentially lower perceptual accuracy for higher ranks. Additionally, pRF measurements revealed that cortical territory devoted to higher ordinalities decreased with rank, reinforcing that neural precision is greatest for early positions (e.g., 1st and 2nd) and declines with rank. These responses did not generalize to symbolic ordinality. Similar tuning to nonsymbolic ordinality emerged spontaneously in hierarchical convolutional neural networks trained on visual tasks. Together, these results suggest that the tuning properties of these neuronal populations support nonsymbolic ordinality perception and may reflect an inherent feature of neural processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.