SynthesisHeart (British Cardiac Society)2026
Survival benefit of guideline-directed medical therapy in older patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure-related mortality in older patients has increased. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains insufficient in this population. This study assessed the survival benefit of GDMT in elderly patients aged ≥65 years old with HFrEF.
methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 5 February 2025. Inclusion criteria were age ≥65 years old with HFrEF, GDMT vs no GDMT and reported survival data. Pooled prevalence, HR and risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI were analysed. Heterogeneity was further explored through subgroup analyses. We evaluated potential small-study effects using Begg's rank correlation test, Egger's regression test, funnel plot inspection and trim-and-fill analysis. Publication bias was analysed visually using a funnel plot.
results34 studies with 92 916 patients from 1994 to 2024 were included. The GDMT group received three of the four main drug classes in three studies, two drug classes in four studies and at least one class in the remaining studies. There were no reported data on the survival benefits of older patients receiving four classes of GDMT. Frail older patients were less likely to receive GDMT (RR 0.63 (0.45-0.89), I2 50%, p=0.009). There was a survival benefit of GDMT in older patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (HR 0.69 (0.64-0.74) p<0.001, Tau
conclusionsThe use of GDMT in older patients with LV systolic dysfunction was associated with a survival benefit. However, the presence of frailty may limit the successful implementation and tolerability of these therapies. High-quality studies are urgently needed to guide the development of novel strategies aimed at optimising the management of older, frail patients with LV systolic function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.