ReviewBiological psychiatry2026
Identification, Prevention, and Treatment of Perinatal Depression in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Narrative Review.
Review in Biological psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Postpartum Depressive Symptoms Among Women with Elevated Prenatal Anxiety in Kazakhstan: Prospective Observational Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perinatal depression is more prevalent in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) than in high-income countries, reflecting greater exposure to physical, psychosocial, and environmental adversities. It can have lasting consequences for the woman, her child, and wider family. Despite its high burden, access to appropriate mental health care for perinatal depression remains extremely limited in most LMICs. In this narrative review, we conducted a search of PubMed and Google Scholar from 2015 to 2024 (with the addition of other key articles based on authorship team consensus) for recent and policy-relevant systematic reviews, meta-analyses, key individual studies, and practice guidelines to provide an overview of identification, treatment, and prevention of perinatal depression in LMICs. Regarding identification, brief screening measures have been adapted and validated in LMICs, but there have been few studies testing the feasibility and effectiveness of screening programs. Cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal therapy have demonstrated effectiveness for perinatal depression in meta-analyses that include LMIC studies, particularly when adapted into brief, structured formats and delivered by nonspecialist providers through task-sharing models. Regarding prevention, evidence from a range of studies supports universal delivery of low-intensity psychosocial interventions during routine perinatal care and psychological interventions for women with elevated symptoms or known risk factors. Multiple barriers to implementation of effective perinatal depression interventions at scale in LMICs remain, including financial and human resource constraints, high service user to provider ratios, and underdeveloped referral pathways. Responses include delivery of interventions by peers rather than health workers and use of digital technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.